CO129-358 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [10-11] — Page 481

conseguen tal

with it.

on see 4 rotands & fallo

The Stutts //. bolli 11 his Cox

473

The Co. has hem bold that the S. 18.

arking the GW. por aport.

I think me might tell them that while

The

Just depi

has not get been reed we hav

Thes

JA

the aft htt

ASC

uport had a def sending home.

as amended after the first reading; day that the S.qS. cannot admit that the fort has no right to amend

the Die without their consent ht that he is prepared to write thin

obsons on the bith; pout out that with the exception of the ntorpectio

3 position is in no way damaged & the amendment, painti then acceptance & the amending ade

the

subject to further conson of the shorpectin

poson.

? Copy to It Kong miting

abors.

so apprecently, but $52 in volume

Graviti, The C

petition to to hand

850

Lappee

I was not clear whether the Tonways ord 1902 was

UBL

passed

that it

Was

public or privati bill - Sk 83 suggesti

خواست نگر

privati iste, but the cutificate required

by clause of the R... toho sent home with

privati order was not sent home with the

orju in question

have a "beyond bon" procedure

Possibly they have

in H.K.

cor bears here for dealing with Wills which affect both public o privati interesti

F

Tramways ades seems to me to be a

often kind.

and tha

WELL WE

The point mace to of importance, because if the order

is to h

vegarded

مصر

privati or hybrid

one

then may be something in the It.t. standing renders

X

& nouto limiting

ar

prescribing the method

of it's rusendment.

of the order is an

patie

Me

I do not see what then

is other than comones of police, good faith whe

to prevent the 11th heeyislation from amending

it ab Machin

time.

Afferentle, the only preria's amendment (ord: 32

passed (with the conscusiena

of 1902 1

Wa

the Company) in the shape of a public oder I wont not write to the compane, at panat

? Write to Jove

proposed

XIR.

8/1

of

川